earlier this week, nasa announced that there was once water on mars. however, does that really mean that there was once life?
i’m here in pittsburgh for training, and i’m wondering the same thing:
The scientists do not know what kind of cutural environment existed at the building site: perhaps simple puppet shows, perhaps aborigines meeting at a water hole, perhaps something else.
Nevertheless, “we believe at this place ‘Pittsburgh’ for some period in time, it was a habitable environment,” said Dr. Steven W. Squyres, an astronomy professor at Cornell and the mission’s principal investigator.
“This is the kind of place that would have been suitable for life,” Dr. Squyres went on, but quickly added: “Now that doesn’t mean life was there. We don’t know that.”
in related news, the rate of depletion of the ozone layer could be three times worse than currently forecast. so agrees the pentagon as well. dubya bush responds, “damn hippies.”
Posted at March 3, 2004 11:49 AMComments are now closed for this entry. Thank you for playing.